IFSA/APRA discuss balanced fund definitions
The Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) is in discussions with both the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) on defining the investment parameters of 'balanced' superannuation funds, according to IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert.
Speaking on Sky News’ Sunday Business program yesterday, Gilbert said the discussions had been prompted by the ongoing debate over the “elements” that define a ‘balanced’ super fund.
“There’s always been debate about what is a 'balanced' fund portfolio or an ‘aggressive’ or a ‘conservative portfolio’, and we’re talking to ASFA, the super lobby and also to APRA so we can get a more agreed position.
“There’s even disagreement about how the rating agencies classify these particular investments, which indicates that the super industry clearly needs to do more work on the definition of those elements.
“We want to come to a fairly quick outcome to ensure there is no doubt about that, and we can educate our customers about what is balanced and what is not.”
Gilbert was responding to a program question on whether a super fund should be entitled to be described as having a ‘balanced’ portfolio when it has a majority exposure to equities.
The question was based on a recent OECD report that found the average balanced super fund in Australia had recorded the second worst investment performance among the 30 OECD countries in 2008.
The OECD report attributed the poor performance to Australian funds having about 57 per cent of funds invested in equities during the year.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
