Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ICA: all planners should be fee-based

financial-planning/fee-for-service/disclosure/commissions/financial-planning-services/financial-planners/association-of-financial-advisers/financial-advisers/AFA/

15 March 2006
| By Larissa Tuohy |

The Institute of Chartered Accountants (ICA) has called for financial planners to move to a fee-for-service model, stating that commission payments inherently result in conflicts of interest.

Manager of financial planning and superannuation Hugh Elvy said: “It appears that Westpoint is an example of how the conflict of interest between the needs of the client and the self-interest of the advice can impact on the financial planning process and therefore the investing public.”

According to Elvy, fee-for-service arrangements are more transparent and give investors greater confidence in the independence of their adviser.

Elvy said: “Whilst disclosure of fees and commissions is imperative, it is just as imperative to ensure the client understands that there is no incentive for planners and advisers to favour one investment product over another.”

He added: “The fact that there can be variations in commissions will inherently cause a conflict of interest, irrespective of capping and disclosure.”

Currently, all ICA members offering financial planning services operate on a fee-for-service model, in the same way that accounting services are fee based.

However, ’Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) chair Michael Murphy believes that many accounting bodies are entering the debate on fees versus commission in order to drive their own business.

He said: “I think it would be fair to say that now you have a huge number of accounting practices moving into financial services, and their model has always been fee-for-service.

“They have got their own press machine the accountants, and they are saying you have to find someone who is fee-for-service, but that is just the model they have always used.”

The AFA has opposed calls for the introduction of a rigid fee-for-service advice structure.

Murphy said such a regime “could do more harm than good for consumers, limiting their choices and access to financial advice”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 19 hours ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND