Growth funds strong in March but down for year

cent/property/bonds/

10 April 2003
| By Freya Purnell |

Growth-options within superannuation funds - those with a 70/30 split between growth and conservative investments - are experiencing one of their most volatile periods of the past two decades, the latestInTechGrowth Funds Survey has revealed.

Growth managers delivered a strong result for March, with median growth funds returning 1.6 per cent, and making it the seventh successive month of either positive or negative returns of 1 per cent or greater.

This solid March result was driven by good returns from Australian shares (up 4 per cent) and listed property (up 4.4 per cent). However international shares (hedged) were down 0.6 per cent, and bonds down 0.4 per cent.

Reversing the “all negative” trend of the previous two months, all managers delivered a positive return for March, withMaple Brown AbbottandTyndalldelivering the best returns of 2.1 per cent. Other top performers for the month wereAM CorpandAusbilwhich both had a 2.0 per cent return.

However despite the strong returns, the news remains gloomy for 2002/03 financial returns to date, with the median manager returning negative 6.1 per cent for the nine months to date.

InTech senior consultant Andrew Korbel says, “With all managers in negative territory, the financial year is shaping up as another negative one. In fact, without an improvement in returns in the remaining three months, this year will be worse for most funds than last year’s negative 4.1 per cent median result”.

And while noting that the recent volatility in returns has created opportunity for stockpickers to add value, the managers in the InTech growth universe have on aggregate lost value from tactical asset allocation (TAA), with the median value added from TAA for the six months ending February 28 a negative 0.52 per cent.

Korbel says, “Four managers have been able to add over 0.5 per cent over the last six months. However the latest results continue to bear out InTech’s view that actively deviating from the fund’s strategic asset allocation via tactical timing shifts is like playing with matches, and not an activity likely to generate positive enhancements to returns in the long run”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 16 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo