Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Grass roots planners not sufficiently consulted

financial-planning/education/consulting/advisers/

19 January 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

There has been a lack of consultation with grass roots advisers around the Government's proposals for lifting professional and ethical standards, according to experienced Victorian-based adviser, Ian McKenzie.

In a submission responding to the Government's exposure draft legislation on lifting professional and ethical standards in the financial services industry, McKenzie said he was concerned at the lack of consultation with grass roots advisers with respect to both the findings of the Financial System Inquiry and the Parliamentary Joint Committee.

Further he said there had been no economic or social impact done on the on the proposed legislation, especially with respect to its impact on the existing stock of financial advisers, small business or the wider community.

McKenzie's submission expresses deep concern that the changes being proposed by the Government may see a significant exodus of experienced advisers and urged grandfathering in similar terms to that being urged by both the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

He said there was a real danger within the exposure draft legislation that adviser stocks would be damaged, undermining Australia's aspirations to become an Asian financial hub.

However it on the legislative proposal to establish a new over-arching standards-setting body that McKenzie is most vocal, arguing that it is unnecessary in circumstances where the Accounting Professional and Ethnical Standards Board (APESB) already exists.

He said the APESB had been formed by the three professional accounting bodies and should be possible for the financial planning bodies such as the FPA and AFA to join the APESB and effectively bring the accounting and financial planning professionals under a single code of conduct.

"Why spend millions of dollars setting up a new standards board when one already exists and probably covers around 75 per cent of financial services practitioners and probably most likely already has the infrastructure and human resources personnel in place to handle the codes of conduct of financial advisers," McKenzie's submission said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND