Govt to better define retail and wholesale investors

25 January 2011
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government has released an options paper forming a key part of the Future of Financial Advice reforms dealing with future definitions of retail, wholesale and professional investors including lifting the key product thresholds.

The options paper, released by the Assistant Treasurer and Minister for Financial Services, Bill Shorten, would at the very least see the financial product value threshold lifted from the current level of $500,000 to $1 million and canvasses giving financial services licensees more discretion in determining who can be regarded as a wholesale client.

One of the underlying considerations of the Government’s options paper is that average incomes and investment values have increased since the ground rules were last changed as a result of the introduction of the Financial Services Reform Act (FSRA) nearly a decade ago.

Included in the examples cited in the options paper are the Australian local councils which lost millions of dollars because they were unwittingly exposed to higher risk products such as collateralised debt obligations.

Among the options canvassed is the simple retention and updating of the current arrangements “to better reflect and take account of the problems encountered during the global financial crisis and the time which has elapsed since the current tests were enacted”.

The second option canvassed involves removing any distinction between wholesale and retail clients with all investors except professional investors receiving the protections and disclosures afforded to retail clients, while the third option canvasses introducing a “sophisticated investor test”.

The proposed “sophisticated investor test” would be based on the actual financial literacy of the investor.

Announcing the release of the options paper, Shorten indicated at least a part of the Government’s thinking when he noted the global financial crisis had revealed the manner in which clients without the necessary investment experience had been exposed to complex financial products.

“We need to make sure the line between retail and wholesale clients properly identifies those in need of regulatory protection,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND