FPA/IFSA code a success

FPA/fpa-chief-executive/ifsa-chief-executive/compliance/disclosure/remuneration/chief-executive-officer/IFSA/

24 January 2007
| By Kate Kachor |

An industry review of the Code of Practice on Alternative Forms of Remuneration has found local licensees and planners have adapted well to the disclosure regime.

An assessment by the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has revealed almost universal compliance levels, demonstrating that the code, which was adopted two years ago, has improved disclosure and furthered best practice.

“The review has reinforced the fact that the code is working effectively and that consumers can feel confident in the transparency of alternative forms of remuneration, with registers available for inspection from all those who accept ‘soft dollar’ remuneration,” FPA chief executive officer Jo-Anne Bloch said.

“While the results are pleasing, we will remain vigilant, and the joint oversight committee will maintain regular and ongoing monitoring of compliance. If and when required, we will update the code in line with best practice.”

In response to questions raised by members, the committee agreed that the FPA and IFSA should provide guidance to their members.

The committee confirmed members should hold ‘nil return’ registers, even if they don’t operate any alternative forms of remuneration, in order to avoid confusion; registers should be available to all members of the public; and copies of the register should be provided when requested.

IFSA chief executive officer Richard Gilbert said: “We are delighted the code is proving to be effective. This assessment demonstrates the efficacy of industry standards and the importance placed on them by members of both organisations.

“Media focus on adviser remuneration and periodic testing of the registers by investigative journalists also indicates that the code is working well, however, this joint IFSA/FPA assessment was important to establish that the code doesn’t warrant an extensive overhaul,” he said.

The assessment of the code was conducted at the end of last year. The assessment included analysis of both the FPA’s and IFSA’s 2005-06 compliance processes and a survey of both FPA and IFSA members.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

3 months 1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

4 months 1 week ago

AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity. ...

5 days 17 hours ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest financial adviser exam, held in November 2025....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo