FPA wants limits on planner designation
|
|
The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has called for a robust mechanism to limit the number of people who can call themselves financial planners.
The call is contained in the FPA’s submission to the Parliamentary inquiry into Financial Products and Services, which also argues that “those who are qualified to use the term ‘financial planner’ should undertake professional obligations over and above the requirements of the law”.
In doing so, the FPA has made clear its intention to develop as a professional body, arguing any new requirements should also enshrine a fiduciary responsibility “along with ethics and integrity in their interactions with clients, effected by a legal regulatory mandate to join a professional body”.
The submission also calls for amendments to regulations to recognise the role of professional bodies in co-regulating planners.
In another key recommendation, the FPA has also called for the tax deductibility of advice fees, including consideration being given to a tax rebate of 30 per cent on a fee up to $2,000.
In what also appears to be a reference to the industry funds' 'compare the pair' television advertising campaign, the FPA submission calls for a tightening of advertising controls to ensure truth in advertising and the use of appropriate and realistic assumptions.
It said the Government should also work with product providers and research houses to establish a comprehensive system of rating for product risk that ensured disclosure of key product risks.
On the question of professional indemnity insurance, the FPA submission said the retail client compensation system had fundamental flaws and should be urgently reviewed through extensive public consultation with industry, consumers and other stakeholders.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
