Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FPA seeks to level the playing field

financial-planners/superannuation-funds/superannuation-trustees/fpa-members/FPA/trustee/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/money-management/chief-executive/IFSA/

30 July 2009
| By Mike Taylor |

Financial planners should be able to access the same class relief as superannuation trustees when providing limited, infra-fund advice, according to the chief executive of the Financial Planning Association (FPA), Jo-Anne Bloch.

Bloch has used an analysis of the new intra-fund regime in this edition of Money Management to state that while financial planners have never sought special dispensation, “perhaps the time has come”.

“For one thing, FPA members who meet much higher than RG 146 standards are at least competent, experienced and capable of providing such advice, whether at the low cost intra-fund end of the spectrum or the more comprehensive end of the advice spectrum,” she said.

Bloch said the FPA was examining ways to ensure members and their clients were not disadvantaged. Included among the ideas was the suggestion that financial planners be able to secure cross-authorisation with the licensee of a superannuation fund trustee.

However, she said the move with the most support seemed to be seeking the same rights as superannuation fund trustees by asking the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to extend the relief provided to all regulated entities.

Bloch said such a request would have the effect of leveling the playing field.

Referring to the notion underpinning the regulatory relief provided to superannuation funds being based on the “special relationship” that exists between a fund and its members, Bloch said if financial planners could demonstrate that “special relationship”, the idea of extending the relief was tenable.

Bloch denied the suggestion that the FPA’s opposition to the intra-fund advice regime was motivated by self interests.

“Our concerns are not self-serving,” she said. “... Those with real self interest and very active lobbyists are the super funds themselves because they now have an avenue to retain members cost-effectively, retain market share and remain competitive — all under the false guise of advice but without the financial planner.”

It is understood the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has similarly suggested that it might be possible for the class relief provided to superannuation funds to be extended to financial planners.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND