FPA seeks to level the playing field

financial planners superannuation funds superannuation trustees fpa members FPA trustee australian securities and investments commission money management chief executive IFSA

30 July 2009
| By Mike Taylor |

Financial planners should be able to access the same class relief as superannuation trustees when providing limited, infra-fund advice, according to the chief executive of the Financial Planning Association (FPA), Jo-Anne Bloch.

Bloch has used an analysis of the new intra-fund regime in this edition of Money Management to state that while financial planners have never sought special dispensation, “perhaps the time has come”.

“For one thing, FPA members who meet much higher than RG 146 standards are at least competent, experienced and capable of providing such advice, whether at the low cost intra-fund end of the spectrum or the more comprehensive end of the advice spectrum,” she said.

Bloch said the FPA was examining ways to ensure members and their clients were not disadvantaged. Included among the ideas was the suggestion that financial planners be able to secure cross-authorisation with the licensee of a superannuation fund trustee.

However, she said the move with the most support seemed to be seeking the same rights as superannuation fund trustees by asking the Australian Securities and Investments Commission to extend the relief provided to all regulated entities.

Bloch said such a request would have the effect of leveling the playing field.

Referring to the notion underpinning the regulatory relief provided to superannuation funds being based on the “special relationship” that exists between a fund and its members, Bloch said if financial planners could demonstrate that “special relationship”, the idea of extending the relief was tenable.

Bloch denied the suggestion that the FPA’s opposition to the intra-fund advice regime was motivated by self interests.

“Our concerns are not self-serving,” she said. “... Those with real self interest and very active lobbyists are the super funds themselves because they now have an avenue to retain members cost-effectively, retain market share and remain competitive — all under the false guise of advice but without the financial planner.”

It is understood the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) has similarly suggested that it might be possible for the class relief provided to superannuation funds to be extended to financial planners.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Chris Cornish

By having trustees supervise client directed payments from their pension funds, Stephen Jones and the federal Labor gove...

1 day 7 hours ago
Chris Cornish

Now we now the size of Stephen Jones' CSOLR tax, I doubt anyone will be employer any new financial adviser from this poi...

1 day 7 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Amazing ! Between the beginning of licencing Feb 2002 and 2008 this was a very good stable industry.Then the do-gooders...

2 days 2 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

10 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND