Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FPA expels planner and bans principal member

FPA/fpa-chief-executive/financial-planning-practice/financial-services-licence/australian-financial-services/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/chief-executive/

26 February 2007
| By Darin Tyson-Chan |

The Financial Planning Association (FPA) has meted out the most severe punishment allowable under its constitutional powers against a Western Australian-based planner and planning practice regarding advice issued about Westpoint investments.

The FPA Disciplinary Committee upheld 29 out of the 35 charges against Annemieke de Boer, expelled her from membership of the association and levied a $47,000 fine against her.

The financial planning practice in question, Centro Financial Synergy, has been banned from being a principal member of the FPA.

Centro Financial Synergy is not related to the listed entity Centro Properties Group.

The professional body’s action against Centro Financial Synergy comes after the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) applied to have the financial services company wound up in January of this year.

ASIC’s request came about due to Centro Financial Synergy’s failure to comply with the regulator’s demand for a written statement regarding Centro’s operations, and the company’s failure to comply with its obligations as an Australian Financial Services Licence holder to lodge a set of audited financial accounts.

The de Boer case was one of three heard by the FPA Disciplinary Committee in January regarding the failed Westpoint Group of companies.

A second case assessed by the committee involved 14 charges relating to Westpoint, of which only six were upheld. A fine of $5,500 was imposed against the member involved, but it was decided the name of the member should not be published.

The third case was adjourned, to be heard again in March, when additional charges are likely to be brought against the member in question and examined.

FPA chief executive Jo-Anne Bloch said: “These actions are significant. They emphasise that the FPA will act to ensure that our standards are maintained at the highest level. We must both protect consumers and safeguard the reputation of the vast majority of professional financial planners, who are professionals in every way.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND