FPA chief defends margin lending
The chief executive of the Financial Planning Association (FPA), Jo-Anne Bloch, has defended margin lending as an investment strategy in the midst of the closure of Storm Financial.
Speaking earlier this week, prior to the official closure of the business by voluntary administrators yesterday, Bloch said while margin lending is a model that has risks, it is one that “people have done extremely well out of”.
“If you start pointing fingers at Storm and their business model then you’re going to have to start looking at a whole range of other issues like hedge funds and all sorts of other instruments,” Bloch said earlier this week.
“I don’t think we’re quite close to running a nanny state just yet, where we determine what’s good and what’s bad; I think people need to go into these things with their eyes wide open.”
Bloch said it’s important for investors to understand that “for all the risk and return there are ups and there are downs, and that’s what we’re facing at the moment”.
The voluntary administrators of Storm Financial yesterday sacked Storm’s 115 staff members and announced the closure of the business.
The business has been closed due to “trading losses being incurred at a rate which the company could no longer absorb”, the voluntary administrators said.
Bloch said while the Storm situation had unique qualities, all financial planning businesses are under some form of pressure as a result of the global financial crisis.
“I think there are plenty of other clients and financial planners invested in shares who are also hurting,” Bloch said.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
