Fee for no service breached super sole purpose test
Superannuation funds which pay commissions to planners when no advice was actually provided to members may have been in breach of the so-called “sole purpose test” under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act.
However, the deputy chair of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, Helen Rowell, has told the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services that the regulator has not directly considered that issue.
Under questioning by counsel assisting the Royal Commission, Michael Hodge QC, Rowell said that APRA had been monitoring what had been occurring with respect to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s actions with respect to fee for no service, but had not acted on its account.
“Has APRA never considered whether fee for no service contravened the sole purpose test,” Hodge asked.
Rowell responded that APRA was monitoring ASIC’s actions on the issue and might take action in the future.
Hodge asked whether there was any limit on the period within which APRA could take action for breaches of the sole purpose test.
Recommended for you
AZ NGA has entered into a strategic partnership with national advice firm MiQ Private Wealth, as a way to provide a succession solution, as well as career development opportunities for staff.
While the advice profession struggles under growing operating costs, Adviser Ratings has found more than half of practices – some 58 per cent – that generate less than $250,000 in revenue report no profit at all.
The Federal Court has ordered the freezing of assets and the appointment of receivers to two entities linked to Australian Fiduciaries, ASIC’s latest move in an ongoing investigation into the company’s managed investment schemes.
Off the back of the August adviser exam results, the profession has seen 17 new entrants hit the Financial Adviser Register (FAR) this week, helping numbers return to positive territory.
