Federal Opposition warns on higher compliance costs

insurance/mortgage/insurance-industry/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/federal-opposition/

5 February 2009
| By John Wilkinson |

The Coalition believes there will be increased compliance costs in keeping the general insurance industry under both state and federal administration.

Federal Shadow Minister for Financial Services Chris Pearce said a system regulated by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and the states is no longer necessary.

“Undue compliance costs and overlapping would most likely be eradicated and state-based insurance monopolies could be expected to disappear,” he said, speaking at an Insurance Council of Australia conference in Sydney.

“Last year the Council of Australian Governments announced measures which will allow the Commonwealth Government to assume responsibility for the regulation of most remaining unlicensed or state-licensed financial services products.”

Under the extension of the Uniform Credit Code, mortgage broking, margin lending and non-deposit lending institutions as well as remaining areas of consumer credit will be moved to Commonwealth jurisdiction.

“The Government announced plans to institute this change by July 1 this year.

“At this stage, we are yet to see an exposure draft or get an indication of how this announcement will translate into practical application.”

Pearce said the Coalition supports these measures in principle as a natural extension of the licensing regime established after the Wallis Inquiry.

“It is interesting to note that if these aforementioned financial services sectors are brought under the federal wing, the insurance sector will remain the only sector within financial services operating under both state and federal supervision,” he said.

“The Coalition is acutely aware of this newly created distinction between insurance and other financial services products.”

Pearce said the Coalition does not see the general insurance regulatory regime as broken or in disrepair.

“Our insurance industry is in good shape, largely as a result of our world-class regulatory structures,” he said.

“There is no justification for radical regulatory reform in the insurance sector.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 16 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo