Failing grade for Australian multi-managers
Despite claims that multi-manager products will perform regardless of market conditions, Standard & Poor’s peer group review of Australian equity multi-managers has found they have struggled to meet their investment objectives over an extended period of time.
S&P awarded five investment strategies three stars and downgraded two others following the review, which covered four managers offering seven strategies.
According to S&P, it’s widely accepted that timing when to invest in growth or value style funds is a very difficult thing to do, as both perform differently through the market cycle.
That said, multi-manager products are designed to take this timing burden away from investors by “constructing funds using the best managers from each style persuasion”.
“Aggregating these portfolios should result in a fund that is typically style-neutral, but that aims to benefit from the superior stock-picking skills of the underlying mangers over time.”
Despite this, S&P’s ‘Australian Equity — multi-manager peer group — 1 Equities — Quant review’ found many multi-managers struggled to meet their investment objectives over extended periods.
The strategies awarded three stars included Russell’s Australian share and opportunities funds, MLC’s growth and value style strategies, and Customer Choice’s Australian share fund. S&P rated both Advance’s and MLC’s Australian share strategies two stars.
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.
