Directors need more control
Representatives of RiskMetrics Group and JP Morgan at the WestLB Asset Management Round Table 2008 have suggested that directors and their boards need to have greater direction over their staff and watch where their management are putting company funds.
Martin Lawrence, head of Australian and New Zealand research at RiskMetrics, made the suggestion during the round table panel discussion on leverage and hedge funds in the US mortgage meltdown. Lawrence said that good directors needed to reign in their staff, direct where funds are going and provide greater accountability to shareholders.
In an interview with Money Management, Lawrence said directors had to be chosen carefully, explaining that a board of wise, experienced hands was needed.
“Boards [should be] playing a greater role in managing their staff,” said Lawrence.
“[Directors] were leaving too much to management without questioning them.”
Paul Brunker, equity strategist for JP Morgan, who was part of the panel, echoed Lawrence’s comments in a later interview.
“It follows on [from leverage, that] if we want companies to avoid leverage and risk-taking activities, boards have to be more pro-active,” he said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
