Dealer group acknowledges advisers emotionally battered
Financial Planning Services Australia (FPSA) advisers have been emotionally "battered" by the ongoing market downturn, chief executive Mark Ryan has acknowledged.
“The major issue for us now is to ensure the mental health of our advisers, a lot of whom have been battered severely,” Ryan said.
“Like advisers everywhere, they have taken this market downturn and the reduction in their client capital personally.
“They’re really feeling the pain that their clients are suffering, while at the same time having to deal with the pain of their own reduced income."
Ryan’s comments follow new research by Wealth Insights, published in Money Management last week, which reveals the human cost of the collapse in markets and investment returns.
The research revealed that while clients rarely blamed their advisers, those advisers were nonetheless bereft at not having provided better advice.
Ironically, the downturn across industry has not prevented the continuing strong growth of FPSA, a fully-owned subsidiary of Netwealth since December last year.
The dealer group has a “significant pipeline of prospective advice firms and dealer groups with which it is involved in merger discussions", he said.
It now comprises 29 representative advice firms nationally (42 advisers), an increase of five firms since Ryan joined as chief executive last August.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?