Cowper takes on ABC over reporting

4 August 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image
expand image

Lawyers for former National Australia Bank (NAB) financial planner, Graeme Cowper, claim a TV report by the ABC naming Cowper alongside generic reports of misconduct by some of the bank's advisers, could act "like a lightening-rod" suspicions raised by the broadcast.

Supreme Court of NSW Justice, Lucy McCallum, ruled that the case against the ABC and its reporter, Matthew Peacock, should be heard alongside Cowper's action against Fairfax Media, two Fairfax journalists, The Age and Jeff Morris, as previously reported.

In her judgement, Justice McCallum accepted that "in the television broadcasts, the plaintiff is not the subject of the degree of focus placed on him in the newspaper articles".

"The format of the television piece is to make extensive reference to generic conduct not attributed to the plaintiff and then to refer to him as one of ‘at least some financial planners identified in the leaked NAB report' who are still giving advice."

However, Justice McCallum accepted "that the naming of the plaintiff at the conclusion of the piece could act ‘like a lightening-rod' for all the suspicion conveyed by the broadcast".

While Justice McCallum said the ABC's reporting did not place Cowper under the same level of focus as the Fairfax articles, she found comments attributed to former Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA) financial adviser, and whistleblower, Jeff Morris, had the potential to link Cowper to allegations of falsifying documents and forging signatures.

"They trusted him I think because they trusted NAB. It's a big institution; it's the same with the CBA. People trust the big institutions. And these people are representing those institutions and the institutions turn them loose, but the advice was appalling. In every case that I've seen so far, there's been excessive gearing, far too much borrowing that people couldn't service and substantial losses that have ruined people's lives," Morris said.

"The ‘him' identified in the third word of that paragraph is plainly Mr Cowper," Justice McCallum said.

"In my view, those remarks are reasonably capable of conveying the meaning that the specific advice identified in the imputation was the advice given by Mr Cowper."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

6 days 20 hours ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

6 days 21 hours ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 1 week ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND