Consumers seek reassurance over super changes


Michael Hutton
Despite the positive nature of the changes to the taxation laws governing superannuation contained in last year’s federal budget, members of the general public are still seeking confirmation that the amendments will not be reversed before they commit to strategies to take advantage of the new regime, according to the partner of a mid-tier chartered accounting firm.
“What I’m finding at the moment is after I’ve explained to clients the changes that are happening to superannuation over the next 12 months, the changes that have already happened and the changes from July 1, the reaction is often to ask me ‘Is this going to last? Has the Government really done its numbers on this?’,” HLB Mann Judd partner Michael Hutton said.
In his opinion, the changes are sustainable because the revenue the Government has raised from taxing superannuation payouts in the past were less significant and less important than the taxes levied on superannuation contributions.
Hutton said that his clients are currently being encouraged to contribute as much money into superannuation before July 1, 2007, to take advantage of the $1 million undeducted contribution limit.
Beyond July 1, he believes people’s attitude towards contributions above and beyond the compulsory superannuation guarantee levy of 9 per cent will change.
“After July 1, 2007, I expect salary sacrificing contributions into superannuation will be a much more popular strategy,” Hutton said.
“If that leaves people short of cash, then if they’re over age 55 they can then start drawing a transition to retirement pension to prop up their now depleted cashflow. And if those people are over the age of 60, then that pension income will be tax free to them,” he added.
“It’s going to be an extremely tax effective strategy for people,” Hutton said.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?