Choice wants asset-based fees banned


The Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) ban on conflicted remuneration should be extended to asset-based fees, according to consumer group, Choice.
The group has used its submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Scrutiny of Financial Advice, to also argue for the banning of commission-based arrangements related to insurance advice.
"Choice believes that commissions, soft-dollar payments, asset-based fees, and any other form of remuneration that incentivises advisers to recommend a product or volume of products must be removed," the submission said.
"As a starting point, current exemptions to the conflicted remuneration ban should be removed from the Corporations Act," it said.
"The Committee should consider recommending an extension of the ban on conflicted remuneration to asset-based fees. Asset-based fees are ongoing fees calculated as a percentage of the total funds under advice. They have many of the same market distorting features created by commissions, which have already been recognised as inappropriate for advisers," it said.
The Choice submission claimed asset-based fees encouraged advisers to direct clients into certain types of investments.
"They are significantly less transparent than fixed fees, and in cases where an adviser accepts asset-based fees from long-term inactive clients, they allow fee-for-no-service business models to thrive (where a client continues to pay a fee long after they have received advice)," it said.
"Fixed fees for advice, either hourly rates or lump sums, remove these failings," the submission said.
Recommended for you
ASIC has permanently banned a former Perth adviser after he made “materially misleading” statements to induce investors.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made a written order to a relevant provider after it gave advice regarding non-concessional contributions.
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.