Calls for Professional Standards Board heard

financial-planning-association/compliance/financial-advisers/financial-advice-industry/financial-services-industry/financial-adviser/parliamentary-joint-committee/financial-planner/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/AXA/treasury/

23 November 2009
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image image
expand image

The Parliamentary Joint Committee led by Bernie Ripoll has recommended the corporate regulator commence immediate work on the creation of a professional standards board for financial advisers, with the possibility the terms ‘financial adviser’ and ‘financial planner’ be restricted to use only by members.

This represents a win for groups such as the Financial Planning Association which lobbied for higher professional standards within the financial advice industry through the accountability that comes with a mandated professional body.

The committee recommended that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission immediately begin consultation with the financial services industry to establish an “independent, industry-based professional standards board”.

The board would oversee nomenclature, competency and conduct standards for financial advisers, the report states.

“This entity would share responsibility with ASIC for establishing, monitoring and enforcing competency and conduct standards for financial advisers,” the Ripoll report states.

“Such an arrangement could also enable the use of terms such as 'financial adviser' and 'financial planner' to be restricted to those qualifying as members and prepared to comply with the conditions imposed by the [Professional Standards Board].”

The FPA had recommended financial planners be defined in legislation and subject to higher standards through professional oversight, including having obligations attached to them through membership of a professional body.

The Boutique Financial Planning Principals Group and the Australasian Compliance Institute also proposed advisers be supervised by a professional body, or bodies, approved by ASIC, while fund managers including AXA and ING Australia also lobbied for such a body.

Treasury said while a professional standards body may have merit, its relationship with ASIC would need to be clearly defined.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

2 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo