BT takes payment push to Canberra

bt-financial-group/dealer-groups/commissions/platforms/financial-advice-industry/BT/government/treasury/

17 May 2010
| By Lucinda Beaman |
image
image image
expand image

BT Financial Group, the dominant player in the investment platform market, is consulting with the Government and regulators about potential reforms in the financial advice industry in an effort to convince legislators that investment platforms are service, rather than product, providers.

Defining platforms as services providers would mean payments from platforms to dealer groups would be excluded from any legislative ban on commissions to advisers or product-specific volume rebates to licensees.

John Shuttleworth, the head of BT Financial Group’s platforms business, which encapsulates both the BT and Asgard platforms, visited Treasury officials in Canberra recently to discuss the proposed changes. The group has also been in continuing close contact with the Minister for Financial Services, Chris Bowen, and the heads of the Government’s reviews into the superannuation and advice industries, Jeremy Cooper and Bernie Ripoll.

The group argued volume rebates between platforms and dealer groups did not create conflict, and pointed to

the fact that the payments are product agnostic and represent fee discounting at a business to business level, and as such did not directly influence adviser actions.

Shuttleworth said some Treasury and other government and regulatory officials were coming to the view that platforms represent a custodial service, and did not impact the relationship between advisers and investors. On coming to that conclusion, officials “start to appreciate that there’s some work they need to do to make sure that when they implement the legislation, they don’t create unintended consequences that mean the industry can’t function effectively”.

“You can’t run a platform without a dealer group,” Shuttleworth said.

“[Dealer groups] are talking to the customers, entering all the information around the investments, they’re doing service and somewhere along the way they have to get paid for that. Whether they’re paid a fee as part of an admin fee or whether they charge that separately, they’ve got to get paid for it.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo