Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Broaden definition of advice subsidy: Bissaker.

financial-services-association/financial-planners/industry-funds/advice/commissions/superannuation-funds/chief-executive/financial-advice/colonial-first-state/

8 August 2008
| By Sara Rich |
image
image image
expand image

Brian Bissaker

The provision of financial advice with respect to superannuation is consistent with the intention of the sole purpose test because when you get advice you maximise the benefit to yourself, according to the chief executive of Colonial First State (CFS), Brian Bissaker.

Participating in a debate at the Investment and Financial Services Association national conference on the Gold Coast, Bissaker also suggested that the industry funds were adopting too narrow a view of the question of product manufacturers “subsidising” advice, whether it was by way of commissions or by payment of fees.

“Advice subsidies come in many forms — commissions is one, and actually hiring internal planners is another, and whenever there is subsidisation there is potential for conflict,” he said.

“But is that bad? No, because it gives people access to advice at a reasonable price. There needs to be a recognition that there is subsidisation of advice going on and it is not all bad.”

The chief executive of major industry superannuation fund Australian Super, Ian Silk, had earlier told the conference that he believed that the absence of commission represented one of the major reasons why financial planners often did not recommend industry funds.

Silk said that while he believed people should be able to use their superannuation balances to pay for advice, he believed that advice needed to be superannuation-related.

Bissaker also suggested that while CFS had been busy within its call centres dealing with the negative returns generated in superannuation funds over the past 12 months, he said much of that activity had now dissipated and this was due, in part, to the heavy involvement of financial planners in reassuring clients.

Silk acknowledged that, as an industry fund, Australian Super had not enjoyed the benefit of the “firewall” provided by adviser involvement.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND