Banks cut staff bonuses, incentives
Royal Commissioner Kenneth Hayne was tough in his critique of financial services staff remuneration, but The Australian Banking Association (ABA) has welcomed a new report by former public service Commissioner, Stephen Sedgwick, that said banks are on track to meet their 2020 deadline to overhaul staff pay.
In April 2017 last year, banks pledged to change the way banks pay and reward their retail staff, including no longer paying retail bank staff bonuses based on sales, and refocussing workplace culture and leadership structure to ensure a focus on the customer is paramount.
Sedgwick’s report, which was commissioned by the ABA, found banks had significantly reduced the use of bonuses based on financial incentives for front line staff and bonuses for bank tellers were now generally based on broader customer service measures, with ‘sales based’ measures greatly reduced.
Salaries for other bank staff were not greatly weighted towards fixed pay, rather than variable bonuses, and banks were retraining front line staff to encourage a ‘customer first’ approach.
The CEO of the ABA, Anna Bligh, said the report showed banks were on the front foot in implementing the reforms to bank staff pay, with many ahead of schedule.
“Bonuses for bank staff are better balanced, focussing on what’s best for the customer and excellent service rather than simply sales targets,” she said.
AUTHOR
Anastasia Santoreneos
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
