Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Bank executive regime could extend to licensees, insurers

BEAR-regime/financial-planning/Kelly-O'Dwyer/

14 July 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Financial planning licensees, insurance and superannuation fund executives could find themselves bound up in the Government’s new Bank Executive Accountability Regime (BEAR) if they are part of a vertically-integrated bank structure.

The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer has released the Government’s discussion paper around the new BEAR regime which makes clear that not only banks but their insurance, superannuation and other subsidiaries could be covered.

The Government’s discussion paper directly asks market participants whether the definition of accountable persons should “apply to individuals in the subsidiaries of a group or subgroup with an ADI [authorised deposit-taking institution] parent, including where the subsidiaries are not regulated by APRA [Australian Prudential Regulation Authority]”.

Dealing with the question of who will be deemed “accountable persons”, the Government’s discussion paper states that the definition of an accountable person “could also include directors and senior executives of the subsidiaries within a group or subgroup with an ADI [bank] parent.

Dealing with the breadth of the BEAR, the discussion paper said: “The net should not be cast so wide that responsibility can be deflected and accountability avoided. The risk is that if everybody is responsible, nobody will be accountable. On the other hand, the definition of accountable persons should not be cast too narrowly so as to exclude individuals with effective responsibility for management and control”.

“The extent to which ADIs would register accountable persons under this element of the definition would vary depending on differences in business models and group structures” the discussion said. “An example of a function that could be assumed to meet this criteria would include the head of a key business area,” it said. “This function would be responsible for the management of a significant proportion of the ADI business or activity, based on its proportion of total gross assets, revenue or profit.”

“This function could include directors or senior executives of subsidiaries within a group or subgroup with an ADI parent,” the discussion paper said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 weeks 3 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

7 months ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

3 weeks 4 days ago

WT Financial’s Keith Cullen is eager for its Hubco initiative to see advice firms under its licence trade at multiples which are catching up to those UK and US financial ...

4 weeks 1 day ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

1 week 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND