Ban commissions, says adviser

remuneration/gearing/commissions/advisers/retail-investors/financial-adviser/investment-advice/

9 October 2000
| By Jason |

Prominent financial adviser Anthony Starkins has called for the outlawing of commissions because they contravene the fiduciary relationship between advisers and clients.

Prominent financial adviser Anthony Starkins has called for the outlawing of commissions because they contravene the fiduciary relationship between advisers and clients.

The First Samuel managing director made the startling statement in a submission to the Senate Select Committee on Superannuation and Financial Services.

Starkins claims the fiduciary duty imposed on advisers means their chief responsibility is to act solely in the best interests of clients. As such, either receiving commissions or being rewarded with other benefits contradicts what the duty is about.

“Until such practices are banned and appropriate legislation recognises the existence of a fiduciary relationship, investors cannot be confident of receiving independent and impartial investment advice,” Starkins says.

The relationship between advisers and clients is also unequal, according to Starkins, since advisers are industry professionals while investors have little or no knowledge, which is why they are seeking assistance.

“Informed consent implies a relationship between equals which, with unsophisticated investors, rarely exists,” Starkins says.

“Any benefit that might influence a planners advice, whether disclosed or not, should be made illegal.”

According to Starkins the industry has a vested interest in the issue but if it fails to move to outlaw commissions, Parliament will seek to protect retail investors through law.

He says lack of action on this issue would leave the industry with unlawful and immoral practices which were disadvantageous for investors.

Starkins was also critical of the efforts of financial institutions in gearing employee remuneration on products depending on whether those products are in-house or externally provided. He says there are also cases where products from competitors are excluded, even if they are superior and best suit the needs of clients.

Starkins says these practices are not well known but represent the most unethical of all commission type practices and all that was wrong with retail financial services.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 3 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
93.34 3 y p.a(%)
2
5
Plato Global Alpha A
28.73 3 y p.a(%)