Ban commissions, says adviser

remuneration/gearing/commissions/advisers/retail-investors/financial-adviser/investment-advice/

9 October 2000
| By Jason |

Prominent financial adviser Anthony Starkins has called for the outlawing of commissions because they contravene the fiduciary relationship between advisers and clients.

Prominent financial adviser Anthony Starkins has called for the outlawing of commissions because they contravene the fiduciary relationship between advisers and clients.

The First Samuel managing director made the startling statement in a submission to the Senate Select Committee on Superannuation and Financial Services.

Starkins claims the fiduciary duty imposed on advisers means their chief responsibility is to act solely in the best interests of clients. As such, either receiving commissions or being rewarded with other benefits contradicts what the duty is about.

“Until such practices are banned and appropriate legislation recognises the existence of a fiduciary relationship, investors cannot be confident of receiving independent and impartial investment advice,” Starkins says.

The relationship between advisers and clients is also unequal, according to Starkins, since advisers are industry professionals while investors have little or no knowledge, which is why they are seeking assistance.

“Informed consent implies a relationship between equals which, with unsophisticated investors, rarely exists,” Starkins says.

“Any benefit that might influence a planners advice, whether disclosed or not, should be made illegal.”

According to Starkins the industry has a vested interest in the issue but if it fails to move to outlaw commissions, Parliament will seek to protect retail investors through law.

He says lack of action on this issue would leave the industry with unlawful and immoral practices which were disadvantageous for investors.

Starkins was also critical of the efforts of financial institutions in gearing employee remuneration on products depending on whether those products are in-house or externally provided. He says there are also cases where products from competitors are excluded, even if they are superior and best suit the needs of clients.

Starkins says these practices are not well known but represent the most unethical of all commission type practices and all that was wrong with retail financial services.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 22 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo