Australian equities – the good, the bad and the ugly

australian equities fund managers BT

5 May 2004
| By Lucie Beaman |

Factors such as branding, fund size, investment style, internal operations (and luck) have ensured that when it comes to the Australian equities sector over recent years, the top 10 funds in terms of performance, inflows and funds under management (FUM) are for the most part uncorrelated.

Assirt Researchsays for established fund managers that gain the trust of investors and advisers, funds flow does not just come down to performance, with brand and sheer strength of distribution offering huge benefits.

TheColonial First State(CFS) Imputation fund has topped the list in terms of FUM for the past four years and also managed to top the inflows table in 2000 and 2001. While it dropped to the middle of the pack in 2002-03, the figures are still interesting when you consider the fund was nowhere to be seen in the top 10 in terms of returns over the four-year period.

Assirt says when it comes to well recognised brands, “the marketing spin on things can entice people to stay in a fund longer than they should, which can be a good or a bad thing”.

“CFS is still a good manager. Size of FUM is an issue, but they’re still managing to make good, but not stellar, returns,” Assirt says.

BT’shigh profile brand carried it through many years of bad performance before investors’ confidence was finally shaken and they pulled the plug.

Part of the reason the BT funds remained comparatively full during negative staff and management issues, Assirt says, “was because of a good track record and some previous good market timing”.

And having survived a difficult run, it appears BT may make a comeback in the Australian equities playing field, still holding a place among the big players in terms of FUM.

One success story over recent years isHunter Hall Investment Management. Employing a partial absolute return type strategy, Assirt says there are few managers that can change the dynamic of their portfolios so dramatically as Hunter Hall.

Recent success, such as returns of 11.2 per cent in turbulent 2002 and 24.6 per cent last year, has led to a significant increase in the size of the fund, but Assirt says this will not be a threat to performance.

“It comes down to when they decide to close to inflows — we’re concerned about when they do close and we’re keen to make sure they’re still operating within capacity.”

While inflows into the Hunter Hall fund do highlight the worrying trend of performance chasing, it has been encouraging to see style neutral JB Were adding value through mixed cycles, Assirt says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Big Feller

This can't be a surprising development. I'm sure every Financial Planner in Australia has had an experience of being sc...

8 hours ago
One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

13 hours ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

3 days 7 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND