Association of Financial Advisers says fee-for-service won't guarantee better advice
The Association of Financial Adviser’s chief executive, Richard Klipin, has warned that shifting to a fee-for-service model will not guarantee consumers receive higher quality financial advice or that financial advisers will create better business models.
Klipin said the industry still had to define the difference between fee-for-service and commission models in the interest of transparency. Fee-for-service was determined by a range of factors and the consumer had a right to know what was included in the fee and sign off on it, Klipin said.
“[Fee-for-service] considers things like margins for overheads, profits and so on. Understanding these metrics is the cornerstone of all profitable and productive businesses,” Klipin said.
“If we accept that a ‘fee’ can be directed by a client but we allow that fee to be paid by a product provider, isn’t it still a commission, no matter what you call it? And as a result, isn’t this kind of ‘fee’ still open to the same conflicts of interest as commissions?" Klipin added.
Recommended for you
Digital advice tools are on the rise, but licensees will need to ensure they still meet adviser obligations or potentially risk a class action if clients lose money from a rogue algorithm.
Shaw and Partners has merged with Sydney wealth manager Kennedy Partners Wealth, while Ord Minnett has hired a private wealth adviser from Morgan Stanley.
Australian investors are more confident than their APAC peers in reaching their financial goals and are targeting annual gains of more than 10 per cent, according to Fidelity International.
Zenith Investment Partners has lost its head of portfolio solutions Steven Tang after 17 years with the firm, the latest in a series of senior exits from the research house.
