Asset-based fees the preferred alternative

commissions/remuneration/fee-for-service/investment-trends/federal-government/government/

27 April 2010
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

Financial planners would likely seek to move to asset-based fee structures in the wake of the Federal Government’s announced intention to abolish commission-based remuneration, according to new research released by Investment Trends.

Investment Trends principal Mark Johnston said his company’s 2009 Planner Business Model Report, conducted late last year, had identified asset-based fee-for-service as being the fastest growing area over the last few years.

“The proportion of planner revenue coming from fixed rate or hourly rate arrangements has only crept upwards since 2006 while the proportion from asset-based fee-for-service models has risen by more than 60 per cent over this time,” Johnston said.

He said definitions and terminology had also changed in circumstances where five years ago the trailing commissions could be described as an asset-based fee while the consensus now had moved to using this term to describe a fixed percentage fee that is independent of individual investments recommended so as not to influence product selection.

Johnston said the use of asset-based fee-for-service was skewed towards planners with high funds under advice (FUA), with planners with an FUA of more than $40 million deriving an average of 35 per cent of their revenue from asset-based fee-for-service charging, compared to an average of 17 per cent among planners with FUA of less than $10 million.

He suggested this indicated that the banning of commissions would have a relatively larger impact on new planners, who usually derived a much higher proportion of their revenue from commissions during their early years while their client base was being built.

Johnston said the research had also indicated that the Government’s announcement would not have come as a great surprise to planners with the survey suggesting that most respondents had an overall sense that upfront commissions and trailing commissions would become a much smaller part of their revenue mix in the future.

“But advisers and licensees may now have to adjust their timelines,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 16 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo