ASIC’s adviser reference-checking protocols potentially ‘prejudicial’

ASIC/financial-advisers/licensees/AFSLs/SAFAA/

20 November 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) proposed reference checking protocol is prejudicial to the interests of financial advisers because it exposes them to potential retribution or serious harm from their existing employers when they seek to switch licensees. 

The Stockbrokers and Financial Advisers Association (SAFAA) has responded to ASIC’s release of a discussion paper on the reference checking protocols by claiming that it contained “a fundamental defect”. 

“There was a fundamental defect in the framework in that it compelled the hiring licensee to request information from the adviser’s current employer,” it said.  

“There is a real risk that this can expose the adviser to retribution or serious harm from the existing employer, if they were so minded. 

“The fact is that not all employers will look favourably on an adviser seeking to leave their current position. Some employers may adopt a vindictive approach as soon as they become aware, and the adviser may suffer some form of retribution or dismissal.” 

“Firms may not always be motivated by ill-will, but in the case of advisers with a client base, a firm may view the prospective departure of an adviser, who may seek to take with them the clients they had been servicing, as a potential threat to their business, requiring steps to minimise any potential threat,” the SAFAA response to ASIC said. 

“In the case of advisers who are currently not employed, these risks may not be great; however, the likelihood more often than not is that advisers will be looking to move while they are currently in employment. It is natural for any employee to look for opportunities that might be more rewarding, and is it is also not uncommon for approaches to be initiated by other licensees looking to attract good advisers to change firms.” 

The SAFAA letter to ASIC said the organisation’s preferred position was for a central source of information about the compliance record of an adviser which was capable of being checked not only by prospective employers but also potentially by members of the public. 

It said such a model was in use in the US.  

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 20 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo