ASIC warns against ‘gaming’ general advice
Ordinary consumers should not be expected to know the difference between personal and product advice, according to Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) deputy chairman, Peter Kell.
Addressing the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia conference in Melbourne, Kell acknowledged that the definitions of product and personal advice represented both an issue and a challenge for the regulator and this was also being impacted by the Financial Systems Inquiry (FSI).
However he said ASIC's focus tended to be directed towards the delivery of personal advice because it was an area in which the regulator believed standards needed to be higher.
"We're addressing head-on the need to lift standards where personal advice is concerned," Kell said and cited ASIC's recent report on the life insurance industry.
However in pointing to the focus on personal advice, Kell made clear the regulator would be seeking to ensure some players did not seek to manipulate the use of general advice.
"We do not want to see people ‘gaming' the difference between the general/product and personal advice regimes," he said.
The ASIC deputy chairman then referenced the regulator's intention to pursue surveillance in the intra-fund advice arena.
Recommended for you
Adviser willingness is the key hurdle to the uptake of ESG matters by financial advisers; they should not feel afraid or embarrassed if they are less familiar with what clients are seeking.
In his first move since the acquisition by Count, former Diverger managing director Nathan Jacobsen has taken up a new leadership role in the financial advice space.
Medical grounds are no excuse for compliance failures as a Victorian AFSL is sentenced for failing to lodge annual financial reports.
The balance of ASIC enforcement activity is skewed towards civil rather than criminal cases, but the corporate regulator says it is seeking to redress this balance.
