ASIC urged to get proactive on AFSL breaches

financial-services-licence/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/storm-financial/australian-financial-services/

11 August 2009
| By Mike Taylor |

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) should be more proactive in utilising its powers in circumstances where the evidence suggests the regulator has acted against planners reactively rather than proactively, according to the CPA Australia.

The accountancy body has used a submission to the Joint Parliamentary Committee on Corporations and Financial Services to point to the fact that actions initiated against planners involved in Westpoint investments had occurred after the collapse.

Pointing to the problems surrounding the collapse of Storm Financial, the submission said it was clear ASIC had the power to investigate and enforce planner obligations with respect to client circumstances and appropriate advice and had previously banned a number of individuals for failing to comply with the Act.

However, it noted that all the bannings which had flowed from the Westpoint collapse had been conducted after the event.

“This perhaps indicates that ASIC currently appears to employ a reactive rather than a proactive approach to enforcing the regulation,” the submission said. “It is possible, however, that ASIC could use information that it receives as part of an application for an AFSL [Australian Financial Services Licence] to take a more proactive approach to its surveillance.”

The CPA submission said while it was not ASIC’s role or responsibility to approve a business model in order to approve an application for an AFSL, the regulator could use the so-called business description core proof provided by applicants to evaluate the risk that an application might breach their obligations once licensed.

“Any applicant who is deemed to be at risk could be reviewed by ASIC within a 12-month period of being granted an AFSL,” the submission said. “This review should include ensuring all relevant processes and licence requirements are still in place and review a random selection of Statements of Advice.”

It said this would aid in identifying whether the licensee was fulfilling its obligations with respect to client circumstances and appropriate advice.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 12 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo