ASIC scrutinising big instos

8 July 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Australia's major institutions are under scrutiny by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) over their handling of financial market benchmarks with three having already been the subject of enforceable undertakings.

The regulator has today issued a report on financial benchmarks in which it has openly declared that it is "investigating a range of financial institutions to determine whether or not there has been benchmark-related misconduct in Australia's financial markets".

"Our inquiries are still underway and, given the size and complexity of the relevant markets, will take some time to complete," the report said.

"We are looking at the activity of Australian financial institutions domestically and overseas, as well as foreign financial institutions that are active in Australia."

The report said that, in particular, ASIC would examine whether financial institutions have failed to adequately supervise and control the day-to-day operations and conduct of traders and submitters.

"We will also investigate whether senior managers were aware of, or were complacent about, any conduct issues that may have been present," it said.

The report said ASIC was examining relevant documents, including trading data, phone recordings, emails and chat messages, and was conducting voluntary interviews and compulsory examinations of numerous individuals, up to senior management level

"We are also requiring a number of financial institutions to undertake their own reviews and/or to provide to ASIC records of reviews already conducted."

The ASIC report said the regulator had accepted enforceable undertakings from UBS AG, BNP Paribas, and The Royal Bank of Scotland in relation to financial benchmarks.

"Each institution reported to ASIC that it had found evidence of conduct seeking to influence its Bank Bill Swap Rate (BBSW) submissions based on how the submission may have benefited its derivatives positions," the report said.

"ASIC held concerns that such conduct may have contravened s912A of the Corporations Act relating to AFS licensees' general obligations."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND