Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ASIC refuses tailored approach to remuneration disclosure

compliance/financial-planning/

29 May 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Amid all the discussion about transparency around planner remuneration, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has refused to allow a planning firm to tailor the manner in which it reveals to clients the bonus opportunities available to its planners.

ASIC's refusal has been revealed in its latest "Overview of decisions on relief applications" with the regulator indicating that it was important for consumers to plainly understand how their advisers were remunerated.

It said the firm had requested a determination that describing the bonus opportunity offered to its authorised representatives as a dollar amount or as a percentage of a known amount (the adviser's salary) would impose an unreasonable burden on the firm and its authorised representatives to disclose confidential salary information.

Instead, the planning firm wanted to be allowed to disclose the advisers' potential bonuses as a description of the method of calculating the remuneration, including worked dollar examples.

We considered that it would not assist consumers to understand how their adviser is remunerated. ASIC said granting the determination would have allowed the firm to disclose the advisers' potential bonuses as a description of the method of calculating the remuneration, including worked dollar examples.

"We considered that it would not assist consumers to understand how their adviser is remunerated," the regulator said.

Discussing the reasons it had refused the application, ASIC said it believed the Parliament "intended the current requirement to be a high standard, prioritising the need for optimal disclosure from a consumer comprehension viewpoint over practicability for providing entities".

"…while we accept there is commercial benefit in keeping remuneration information confidential, we need to weigh that commercial benefit against the regulatory detriment of less than optimal disclosure," it said.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

2 days 4 hours ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

3 weeks 6 days ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month ago

After last month’s surprise hold, the Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision....

4 weeks ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

4 days 22 hours ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND