ASIC obtains orders against fraudulent debt relief company

ASIC Debt Wipeout Debts Knockout daniel crennan David Murphy Anastasios Mavroulis Kewa Ruqhiu Matthew Ruwhiu

15 October 2020
| By Chris Dastoor |
image
image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has obtained interim orders and injunctions against Debts Knockout, which provided financial services through Debt Wipeout, for making false or misleading representations.

Debt Wipeout advertised on billboards, shop-a-dockets, websites, social media and in person with claims it could “extinguish” consumer debt for an up-front payment of 15%-25% of the outstanding balance.

However, the company failed to pay any creditors and consumers debts were not extinguished.

The orders were obtained from the Federal Court of Australia, which also included operator of the business, David Murphy; owner of the business name, Anastasios Mavroulis; and Kewa Ruqhiu and Matthew Ruwhiu due to unlicensed financial services.

The alleged contraventions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and ASIC Act 2001 (Cth) included:

  • Carrying on a financial services business without holding an Australian financial services licence (AFSL);
  • Engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct while carrying on a financial services business;
  • Making false or misleading representations while carrying on a financial services business;
  • Engaging in unconscionable conduct while carrying on a financial services business; and
  • Engaging in conduct that was liable to mislead the public as to the nature while carrying on a financial services business.

Daniel Crennan, ASIC deputy chair said: “We will continue to address the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which includes taking action to protect consumers in financial stress due to potentially unscrupulous conduct.”

On 6 October 2020, Justice Farrell found on the evidence filed by ASIC that there was a prima facie case that the defendants and Debts Knockout had engaged in contraventions of the Corporations Act and ASIC Act.

The Court also found there was a need to protect aggrieved persons and made asset preservation orders against Murphy.

Additional orders requiring the disclosure of information to ASIC against each of the defendants and Debts Knockout were also made.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Big Feller

This can't be a surprising development. I'm sure every Financial Planner in Australia has had an experience of being sc...

4 hours ago
One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

8 hours 53 minutes ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

3 days 3 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND