ASIC focus on stockbroker advice
Stockbrokers and investment advisers have found themselves in the cross-hairs of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) which has used its latest Market Supervision Report to raise questions about the provision of general and personal advice.
The report, released by ASIC yesterday, pointed to the regulator having serious concerns about the type of advice being provided in the sector.
"We are concerned about the high proportion of general advice compared to personal advice, particularly by full-service brokers," the report said. "We intend to focus more efforts on reviewing the provision of advice by market participants, whether it is being categorised correctly as personal or general advice, and whether the relevant obligations are complied with appropriately."
The report said ASIC's scrutiny might include a focus on management oversight and adviser training.
"To date, our compliance reviews have identified deficiencies with the provision of personal advice and the requirement to provide a clear, concise and effective Statement of Advice (SOA)," it said. "For example, we identified market participants that had not provided sufficient information to clients regarding the basis on which the advice was given—suggesting that inadequate consideration may have been given to clients' circumstances, goals and objectives."
The report said ASIC was also continuing to focus on instances of unauthorised discretionary trading.
"For market participants with licence authorisations to conduct managed discretionary trading, we reviewed their processes to ensure compliance with the relevant requirements. In some instances, additional guidance was provided to ensure that participants' obligations were met," it said.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
