ASIC focus on stockbroker advice
Stockbrokers and investment advisers have found themselves in the cross-hairs of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) which has used its latest Market Supervision Report to raise questions about the provision of general and personal advice.
The report, released by ASIC yesterday, pointed to the regulator having serious concerns about the type of advice being provided in the sector.
"We are concerned about the high proportion of general advice compared to personal advice, particularly by full-service brokers," the report said. "We intend to focus more efforts on reviewing the provision of advice by market participants, whether it is being categorised correctly as personal or general advice, and whether the relevant obligations are complied with appropriately."
The report said ASIC's scrutiny might include a focus on management oversight and adviser training.
"To date, our compliance reviews have identified deficiencies with the provision of personal advice and the requirement to provide a clear, concise and effective Statement of Advice (SOA)," it said. "For example, we identified market participants that had not provided sufficient information to clients regarding the basis on which the advice was given—suggesting that inadequate consideration may have been given to clients' circumstances, goals and objectives."
The report said ASIC was also continuing to focus on instances of unauthorised discretionary trading.
"For market participants with licence authorisations to conduct managed discretionary trading, we reviewed their processes to ensure compliance with the relevant requirements. In some instances, additional guidance was provided to ensure that participants' obligations were met," it said.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
