Are the days of the dealer group numbered?
The financial planning dealer group model has probably passed its use-by date and dealer groups should look to major legal firms for the type of commercial model that will help them move ahead, according to ClearView managing director, Simon Swanson.
Speaking to Money Management, Swanson said that he believed the common dealer group model represented a “false construct” in the context of the changes which had occurred in the financial services industry over the past decade, including the Future of Financial Advice (FoFA) changes, the Life Insurance Framework (LIF) and the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) regime.
Swanson also pointed to the position that groups such as the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) would likely adopt as code-monitoring bodies under the auspices of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and FASEA.
He said he personally believed that increasing numbers of planning firms would become self-licensed under the new regime, therefore carrying responsibility for their own professionalism and regulatory interactions.
Swanson said that, in such circumstances, he believed it was likely that the future of dealer groups lay in adopting the same model as major law firms within which individual lawyers were responsible for maintaining their own professional standards and licensing but gained the advantage of working under a large commercial umbrella.
“Dealer groups were a reflection of the industry as it used to be, but I believe they are struggling to remain both relevant and commercially viable in the current environment,” he said.
Recommended for you
As the industry navigates the fallout from recent product failures, two major AFSLs have detailed their APL selection process and relationship with research houses, warning a selection error could “destroy” a licensee.
The impending retirement of financial advisers in their 50s could see the profession face significant succession challenges over the coming decade and younger advisers may not be the answer.
With a third of AFSLs being solo advisers, how can they navigate key person risk and ensure they are still attractive propositions for buyers when it comes to their succession planning?
A quarter of advisers who commenced on the FAR within the last two years have already switched licensees or practices, adding validity to practice owners’ professional year (PY) concerns.
