Are advisers being asked to ‘dob’ each other?

Royal-Commission/AFA/phil-anderson/ASIC/

7 February 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government is proposing legislative changes which would obligate financial advisers or licensees to breach report other organisations or advisers.

The startling proposal is included in a consultative document issued by Treasury around the Financial Sector Reform (Hayne Royal Commission Response – Protecting Consumers (2020 Measures)) Bill 2020 implementing key recommendations of the Hayne Royal Commission.

The explanatory memorandum released by Treasury explains a significant expansion of the situations that would generate a need for licensees or planners to report to ASIC including:

  • investigations about whether a specified breach or likely breach has occurred or will occur, and outcomes of those investigations;
  • conduct constituting gross negligence or serious fraud (to the extent this conduct was not previously considered a breach of the financial services law); and
  • where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that a reportable situation has arisen in relation to a financial adviser operating under another licence.

And it is this third category which has raised eyebrows around financial planning policy specialists such the Association of Financial Adviser’s (AFA’s) Phil Anderson who said he believed there were significant implications for financial advisers and their licensees from such an arrangement.

The explanatory memorandum went on to explains that “financial services licensees will have to report to ASIC about serious compliance concerns, which are reflected in the reportable situations, in relation to individual financial advisers operating under another licence. A copy of these reports will need to be provided to the licensee responsible for the financial adviser at the time the concern arose. Such reports are due within 30 calendar days.”

Elsewhere in the legislation, the Government would provide qualified legal privilege from defamation proceedings for licensees sharing information as part of a reference-checking related to advisers moving between licensees.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 11 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo