APRA calls for improved investments classification
|
|
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has recommended superannuation trustees adopt a suitable classification process to ensure members can distinguish between the characteristics of each investment strategy on offer.
In a letter to trustees, APRA’s deputy chairman Ross Jones said trustees could help by ensuring that for each strategy offered the expected frequency of negative returns over a 20-year period was clearly stated.
“At present there are no standard risk descriptors and there has been no industry-wide standard asset allocation for different labels — such as balanced, conservative or growth,” he said.
“This leads to confusion on the part of fund members and makes it difficult to properly compare investment performance,” Jones added.
Jones said the brief guidance had been prepared in consultation with industry associations and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), and would be followed up in more detail later.
He added that the Investment and Financial Services Association and the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia also supported the approach, and had indicated they would work with their members to develop good practice guidance that would be used to increase comparability.
APRA envisaged that regulatory guidance would be issued by ASIC in the first year of transition to the shorter Product Disclosure Statement requirements, and would take into account the requirements of APRA and joint industry guidance.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
