AIOFP strikes deal with AIG

insurance/professional-indemnity/cent/FPA/chief-executive/

20 November 2003
| By Craig Phillips |

TheAssociation of Independently Owned Financial Planners (AIOFP) has negotiated a deal with insurance group AIG to offer its members significantly discounted professional indemnity (PI) cover.

AIOFP sources close toMoney Managementsay a deal has been struck resulting in member dealer groups gaining PI cover for 1.5 per cent of gross revenue, with the likelihood of premiums falling to as little as 1 per cent for firms with lower risk profiles.

AIOFP chief executive Peter Johnston, however, while acknowledging an agreement has been reached, is unable to confirm the insurer involved or the offer rate due to “commercial sensitivities”, but does say that the group struck “a good deal”.

Given the market average for PI cover is 2.5 per cent, the AIG deal will save a firm with a $5 million turnover at least $50,000 in premium costs per annum, and at best $75,000.

“We have a member who’s paying 4 per cent and he’s got a $1 million turnover, so he’s paying $40,000 and we can get that for him now for much less.

“We also have a member in Western Australia who was the first in and he’s made a $20,000 saving,” Johnston says.

Despite there being a flat rate offered to all member groups, dealers will be assessed individually and rates will vary.

“We will have straight rates across the top and discounts for size and groups that have their people all under one roof, which lowers risk given the greater control of what goes out the door for these groups,” Johnston says.

He adds one factor impressing the underwriter (AIG) was most independently owned groups are small businesses operated by directors who have their house on the line and therefore are very careful about any advice given to investors.

“Whereas if you’re an adviser working for a bank and you give shoddy advice, then the bank can get over it,” he says.

AIOFP has 48 member firms representing more than 600 advisers and $4.3 billion in funds under advice.

“One of the two major reasons we went down this road was firstly we never thought the FPA could pull it off,” Johnston says.

“And secondly, from an informed source on theFPAboard, the board has vetoed a move towards internal self-insurance because the institutions don’t believe it’s in their best interest for the independently owned groups to get assistance.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

5 days 5 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo