AIOFP blocks PI cover

financial-planners/mortgage/insurance/property/professional-indemnity/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/van-eyk/chief-executive/morningstar/lonsec/

5 July 2007
| By Liam Egan |

The Association of Independently Owned Financial Planners (AIOFP) is to exclude professional indemnity (PI) cover to members who invest client money in property funds without a minimum investment grade rating.

The move was triggered by the collapse of Bridgecorp Finance, owing an estimated $24 million to investors, as well as that of Westpoint and Fincorp, according to AIOFP chief executive Peter Johnston.

Ironically, the move comes in the same week PI cover for financial planners officially became mandatory — by way of the promulgation of Corporations Regulation 7.6.02AAA.

Johnston said its brokers have been asked to restructure the PI cover the AIOFP offers members to exclude investments in property products without at least a three star investment grade or equivalent rating from either Lonsec, Morningstar, or van Eyk.

Johnston said the move was intended as a disincentive for its 1,700 member planners in 140 practices to get involved with property funds where there are conflicts of interests between management and third parties.

Johnston said AIOFP members should not be in a relationship with a property fund where there’s any relationship with someone raising money and then someone investing money.

Bridgecorp, Westpoint, Fincorp, Estate Mortgage, Telford and others are examples of where conflicts between management and third parties led to the collapse of the fund.

“These funds go under [and] financial planners invariably get the blame as the ‘soft target’, and everyone else runs for political cover.”

Johnston said the move was also intended to try to mitigate all of the risks that lower the cost of PI cover, as insurance always increases when there are major calamities in the marketplace.

It is also intended to “assist both ASIC [Australian Securities and Investments Commission] and consumers by starving these conflicted relationships of capital”.

“Unfortunately for the public’s ultimate protection, ASIC are restrained by Australia’s Constitution to take total control of the property market, leaving loopholes for group’s like Westpoint to exist.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 6 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo