Aggressive tax advisers on notice



|
Prominently aggressive tax advisers and tax managers are likely to be more closely targeted by the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) on the basis of the risk they present to businesses.
The Commissioner for Taxation, Michael D’Ascenzo, used an address to the Corporate Tax Association to warn large companies of the ATO’s vigilance with respect to the types of transactions they enter into and the role played by some advisers.
“Where a transaction and its ultimate outcome are based on commercial (and not tax) grounds large business should not need to worry about the application of the general anti-avoidance provisions of the law,” he said. “On the other hand, these provisions may apply to arrangements structured in such a way that their prevailing purpose is tax avoidance (even where the arrangement has a broader commercial objective).
“We are currently considering including more prominently aggressive tax advisers and tax managers as one element in our risk rating and sharing this aspect of our risk rating with senior management in the large business,” D’Ascenzo said.
Recommended for you
An FAAA recommendation to make PY advisers subject to non-compete clauses would place candidates in a “hostage situation” with their employer and potentially deter new entrants, say commentators.
While the profession struggles to keep up with strong consumer demand, a third of people who have passed the ASIC adviser exam aren’t actively practising, so where is this missing third?
Half a year after Count Financial told its advisers to exit several Metrics Credit Partners funds, research house Lonsec has now downgraded two of these products over governance concerns.
As the advice industry evolves with technology, two business consultants have said successful advice firms will be those which focus on delivering an “experience” for their clients, beyond just a transactional service.