AFA rejects calls for mandated fee-for-service
Dennis Bateman
The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has joined this week’s fees versus commissions debate, rejecting calls for the abolition of commissions on financial advice and instead promoting choice and competition.
According to AFA president Dennis Bateman, mandating a single model of remuneration is “wrong”. Bateman said industry debate should instead focus on ensuring choice for Australian investors, whether choice of adviser, advice model, products or payment options.
AFA chief executive officer Richard Klipin also responded to the remarks of former Financial Planning Association chairman John Hewison made earlier this week.
“The one-size-fits-all model of fee-for-service and invoicing your clients is all well and good for certain segments of the marketplace, but a competitive market is all about providing options for consumers and not restricting choice,” Klipin said.
According to Klipin, the savings, superannuation and insurance ‘gaps’ in Australia would be “exacerbated by calls for a rigid fee-for-service model”, with the AFA chief implying that an industry-wide fee-for-service model would restrict access to “accessible, affordable quality advice”.
Bateman and Klipin argue that promoting effective fee disclosure, the provision of quality advice and improving the financial literacy of Australians should be the focus of the industry.
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
