Advisers warned on election limbo

"financial-planning"/

9 May 2016
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) is urging planners to be cautious in the advice they provide during the 55 days of the Federal Election campaign because of the uncertainties created by the Federal Budget on both existing and new strategies.

AFA chief executive, Brad Fox said his organisation could foresee a number of advice situations in which advice provided to clients might need to alter depending upon who ultimately won the 2 July, Federal Election.

"The Budget heralded changes that, if legislated, will significantly impact some of the financial advice strategies currently in place with some financial advice clients, as well as almost requiring "double" advice for future strategies," Fox claimed.

He said uncertainty in areas like Non-Concessional Contribution (NCC) limits, that had a retrospective element to them, meant advisers needed to tread very carefully in providing advice until a new Government is formed and the Budget measures are either passed or denied.

"We can foresee a number of advice situations where an adviser may have to explain to a client that the advice they give may change, depending on the outcome of the election," Fox said.

"This may mean saying something like — ‘if the measures announced in the Budget are adopted, then my advice to you is X, but if they do not become legislation then my advice to you is Y'."

He claimed the most significant short term impact would be on advice which requires decisions to be made or actions to be taken between now and 30 June because there will be no legislative certainty in this time period.

Just as importantly, Fox said advice strategies already in place with existing clients that required NCCs to be made from Budget night would also need to be reconsidered if an individual's contributions, including those backdated to 2007, would exceed the $500,000 NCC cap.

"Advisers need absolute clarity on the client's NCC since 2007 before allowing any further NCCs to be made. The suggested penalty consequences of getting this wrong are too large to ignore," he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

5 days 2 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo