Advice scandal prevention requires investor differentiation
The prevention of advice crises in a post-Murray financial system will hinge on differentiating between wholesale and retail investors, an investor registry head believes.
Sophisticated Access founder Peta Tilse said the failure to properly distinguish between the two investor types has been behind expensive advisory scandals, with the crux of the problems coming down to issues like disclosure.
"If the Government adopts the recommendations in the Murray Report, it is going to be even more critical for financial product providers and distributors to distinguish between the different investor types," Tilse says.
"Getting this wrong means the consumer may not be getting the right levels of disclosure, or access to financial products. These issues have been at the core of some of the recent advisory scandals, and very costly to all parties involved."
Tilse said the recommendations from the recent Financial System Inquiry advocate "fair treatment" of investors and believes this includes recognising their distinction and acting accordingly.
Recommended for you
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
Having peaked at more than 40 per cent growth since the first M&A bid, Insignia Financial shares have returned to earth six months later as the company awaits a final decision from CC Capital.
