Accountant ordered to pay cost over Great Southern advice

financial-planning/accountant/

11 December 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

A South Australian accountant's advice to invest in failed agriculture investment schemes has cost him more than $400,000.

The Supreme Court of South Australia ordered David Abram to pay damages of $412,242, plus costs, to a client after an appeal.

Abram's client, Gary Jackson, had initially been awarded damages of $288,240 and costs up until 4 July 2013, with Jackson being ordered to pay costs for the remainder of the proceedings up to 24 September 2014, on the grounds that he had failed to accept a filed offer from the respondents of 19 June 2013 to consent to judgment in the sum of $257,000 plus interest and costs.

Court documents revealed that Jackson made the following investments in schemes that were managed and promoted by the Great Southern Group:

  • 2005 plantations project — $15,000;
  • 2006 cattle project — $140,000;
  • 2007 cattle project — $140,000;
  • 2007 olive project and options — $48,000; and
  • 2008 wine grape project — $102,200.

The Supreme Court found that the initial judge erred in not finding that that Abram was liable in damages to Jackson for a loss from his investment in the 2006 cattle project in the sum of $119,000, and for not finding Abram liable for the loss of the entire $140,000 invested by Mr Jackson in the 2007 cattle project.

The initial judge found that Abram was negligent in three ways:

  • Because he failed to warn Jackson of the risk of having such a large proportion of his investment in Great Southern;
  • Because he failed to advise Jackson to spread the risk; and
  • Because he actively encouraged Jackson to place further investments with Great Southern after Jackson had expressed concern about "putting all his eggs in one basket"
Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 5 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

2 weeks ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo