Accountant ordered to pay cost over Great Southern advice

11 December 2015
| By Nicholas |
image
image
expand image

A South Australian accountant's advice to invest in failed agriculture investment schemes has cost him more than $400,000.

The Supreme Court of South Australia ordered David Abram to pay damages of $412,242, plus costs, to a client after an appeal.

Abram's client, Gary Jackson, had initially been awarded damages of $288,240 and costs up until 4 July 2013, with Jackson being ordered to pay costs for the remainder of the proceedings up to 24 September 2014, on the grounds that he had failed to accept a filed offer from the respondents of 19 June 2013 to consent to judgment in the sum of $257,000 plus interest and costs.

Court documents revealed that Jackson made the following investments in schemes that were managed and promoted by the Great Southern Group:

  • 2005 plantations project — $15,000;
  • 2006 cattle project — $140,000;
  • 2007 cattle project — $140,000;
  • 2007 olive project and options — $48,000; and
  • 2008 wine grape project — $102,200.

The Supreme Court found that the initial judge erred in not finding that that Abram was liable in damages to Jackson for a loss from his investment in the 2006 cattle project in the sum of $119,000, and for not finding Abram liable for the loss of the entire $140,000 invested by Mr Jackson in the 2007 cattle project.

The initial judge found that Abram was negligent in three ways:

  • Because he failed to warn Jackson of the risk of having such a large proportion of his investment in Great Southern;
  • Because he failed to advise Jackson to spread the risk; and
  • Because he actively encouraged Jackson to place further investments with Great Southern after Jackson had expressed concern about "putting all his eggs in one basket"
Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND