Will larger SMSFs lead to more family disputes?

CPA-Australia/SMSF/

29 September 2020
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Increasing the size of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) has the potential to give rise to increased disputation between fund members, including death benefit disputes and possibly instances of elder abuse.

That is the assessment of major accountancy group, CPA Australia which has told a Parliamentary Committee that while it does not oppose the Government’s move to increase the maximum number of SMSF members from four to six, it does foresee the potential for problems to arise.

In its submission, CPA Australia cited a number of examples of problems arising from the changes which it said it believed needed to be taken into account.

“By way of example, consider a common family unit comprising parents and up to four children. If all were members of the same SMSF then it would be possible for four of them to decide preferences,” the CPA Australia submission said. “Differences, and sometime rivalries, between family members is common and the larger the family the more likely these disagreements are to occur.”

“What is best for one member may not be best for another and sometimes it can be difficult, and costly, for a compromise to be reached. These differences might be about a member joining or exiting the fund or it may be about particular fund investments or how and to whom a benefit should be paid.”

The submission also foreshadowed possible problems around death benefit nominations, while acknowledging this might not necessarily be the case.

“However, the potential for such disputes to arise is increased, and given that death benefits disputes are an increasing problem for all superannuation funds, a proactive legislative and regulatory solution needs to be considered to address this concern,” it said.

The CPA Australia submission also pointed to governance risks and suggested that “the ATO [Australian Tax Office] works with accountants and auditors to ensure that adequate guidance is provided for trustees to better assess and manage any increased risks that a larger number of members may present”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 3 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 4 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 4 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo