Is tax the major SMSF attraction?

productivity-commission/APRA/SMSFs/superannuation/

4 September 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Productivity Commission (PC) needs to consider why Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) funds do not allow their members to achieve the tax outcomes enjoyed by members of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs), according to specialist firm, Dixon Advisory.

The company has used its submission to the PC’s inquiry into superannuation efficiency and competitiveness to counsel the commission to be careful in seeking to make comparisons between APRA-regulated funds and SMSFs.

In particular, it suggested that the PC’s surveys of SMSF trustees needed to be carefully worded to obtain an accurate picture.

“To ensure a balanced assessment of competition across the system and genuine alignment to members’ best outcomes, the commission should extend the scope of Trustee surveys to consider why APRA funds do not allow their members to achieve tax outcomes that are already utilised by SMSFs (i.e. separation of capital gains income out from investment income would allow unitised funds to apply a 10 per cent tax rate to capital gains, rather than applying an overall tax rate of 15 per cent to all income),” the Dixon Advisory submission said.

In doing so, it noted that some APRA funds had moved to adopt a whole of life investment approach which allowed members to retain investments from accumulation all the way to the pension phase, allowing members to take a long-term investment approach and reduce unnecessary transactional costs, including in some instances tax, as well as risk.

“In determining the reasons why trustees establish an SMSF, the commission should consider the final wording of survey questions carefully,” it said.

The submission said that given one of the major benefits of superannuation is the tax concessions provided for saving towards retirement, “it would be unusual that individuals don’t identify tax as a reason for using their particular super fund”.

The Dixon Advisory submission pointed to the significant differences which existed between APRA-regulated funds and SMSFs, not least the generally much older demographic of SMSF trustees and the substantially higher account balances contained within SMSFs.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 20 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo