Is tax the major SMSF attraction?

4 September 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Productivity Commission (PC) needs to consider why Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) funds do not allow their members to achieve the tax outcomes enjoyed by members of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs), according to specialist firm, Dixon Advisory.

The company has used its submission to the PC’s inquiry into superannuation efficiency and competitiveness to counsel the commission to be careful in seeking to make comparisons between APRA-regulated funds and SMSFs.

In particular, it suggested that the PC’s surveys of SMSF trustees needed to be carefully worded to obtain an accurate picture.

“To ensure a balanced assessment of competition across the system and genuine alignment to members’ best outcomes, the commission should extend the scope of Trustee surveys to consider why APRA funds do not allow their members to achieve tax outcomes that are already utilised by SMSFs (i.e. separation of capital gains income out from investment income would allow unitised funds to apply a 10 per cent tax rate to capital gains, rather than applying an overall tax rate of 15 per cent to all income),” the Dixon Advisory submission said.

In doing so, it noted that some APRA funds had moved to adopt a whole of life investment approach which allowed members to retain investments from accumulation all the way to the pension phase, allowing members to take a long-term investment approach and reduce unnecessary transactional costs, including in some instances tax, as well as risk.

“In determining the reasons why trustees establish an SMSF, the commission should consider the final wording of survey questions carefully,” it said.

The submission said that given one of the major benefits of superannuation is the tax concessions provided for saving towards retirement, “it would be unusual that individuals don’t identify tax as a reason for using their particular super fund”.

The Dixon Advisory submission pointed to the significant differences which existed between APRA-regulated funds and SMSFs, not least the generally much older demographic of SMSF trustees and the substantially higher account balances contained within SMSFs.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND