Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Tax hungry states impeding annuities

financial-planning/funds-management/superannuation/annuities/

22 June 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Federal Government has been told that it needs to start negotiating with the States to eliminate the confusion which sees State Governments taxing elements of Deferred Lifetime Annuities.

The call has been made by Challenger Limited which has used its submission to the Government's Tax White Paper discussion paper to strongly criticise the degree to which State stamp duties are impacting life insurance and deferred lifetime annuities.

"The issue of some types of annuity with particular features may result in part of the product becoming subject to State stamp duties which can be as high as 10 per cent," the submission said. "This is because State Revenue Offices often have a broad view of what amounts to general insurance and will construe peripheral aspects of the product to be dutiable riders."

The submission said that deferred lifetime annuities (DLAs) were superannuation annuities and should not attract stamp duty in whole or in part.

However it said the industry's experience with some state revenue offices was that an explicit clear announcement needed to be made at inception "otherwise contrary interpretations can emerge from those offices at later points in time".

"However, notwithstanding the desirability of resolving this issue with the States, its resolution should not be permitted to delay removal of the impediments to DLAs," the submission said.

It said the stamp duty rules as they apply to these types of annuity products were "uncertain, ambiguous and inconsistent across jurisdictions".

"In our view, the complex, uncertain and inconsistent possible application of ‘nuisance' taxes such as insurance duty to DLAs clearly highlights the broader inefficiencies and difficulties in administering certain state taxes," the Challenger submission said. "More importantly, the current system of state taxation can impose real and significant obstacles to the promotion of products such as DLAs which should otherwise be facilitated as a matter of good policy."

"The Australian government should consult with the State Governments to eliminate this potential unnecessary additional cost, both in the context of inefficient state taxes such as insurance duty on DLAs specifically and at a broader level the removal of inefficient state taxes such as insurance duty and other stamp duties in their entirety"

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND