Superannuation roundtable must be wary of impacts

13 February 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The Federal Government needs to consider what impact any changes to Australia's superannuation regime will have on various sectors of the community, according to Institute of Chartered Accountants' superannuation specialist Liz Westover.

Commenting on the Government's establishment of a superannuation roundtable, Westover said improvements to the system could mean different things to different people, and pointed to the situation with respect to retirement incomes' adequacy and the range of options being canvassed.

She said one option being discussed was the removal of the $450 per month threshold for payment of superannuation guarantee (SG) amounts for employees, so that workers earning less than this amount will receive some form of superannuation.

"However, when you consider the potential impact on employers, particularly on small businesses, I don't see this as a viable solution," Westover said.

"Employers are already tasked with the collection and payment of SG for their employees. The removal of the threshold would only increase the administrative and financial burden on employers, which may be significant for small business owners," she said.

"Such an increase in the administrative burden may result in many owners rethinking their employment of these workers, meaning those workers may be left without any income, let alone superannuation."

Westover said the payment of the superannuation guarantee to these low-income earners would involve minor amounts and deliver only a marginal impact to their retirement savings.

"The reality is for low-income earners, money in their pocket now is often a higher priority than saving for retirement," she said.

"Good policy development in superannuation weighs up the pros and cons of changes to the super system and determines how it will impact on other areas of the community," Westover said.

"In taking counsel from industry spokespeople at the superannuation roundtable, the government will need to be very careful to ensure the needs of other sectors are not being unduly imposed on."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND