People ‘copy’ colleagues’ superannuation investment choices

People tend to ‘copy’ their colleagues’ superannuation investment strategies, with gender balance within the workplace impacting women’s decisions, according to Monash Business School.

The Monash study, which was based on data on 28,031 members provided by Mercer, found that, when people do actively engage with their superannuation investment strategy, it would likely be influenced by conversations or perceptions about what others in their workplace do.

Dr Carly Moulang, of the Monash Department of Accounting, said that utilising colleagues’ experience and knowledge in making super choices showed the role identity economics played in financial decisions.

Related News:

“Observing others and making social comparisons may help alleviate the uncertainty individuals experience when making complex decisions such as those related to superannuation investment choices,” she said.

Moulang said that this gave some strong indications to super trustees on how improving financial literacy regarding retirement and investments in the workplace could have a stronger flow-on effect than just on an individual basis.

Realising that the workplace plays a strong role in members’ super decisions also “may have important implications for the ways that superannuation trustees communicate and educate their members when it comes to taking charge of their superannuation,” Monash said.

The study also found that women were more likely to be active in making superannuation decisions when in female-dominated workplaces, but reduced engagement with super when part of a female minority.

Moulang said that employers needed to better understand how gender balance could impact employees’ engagement with their superannuation investments strategy.

“If women are in a male-dominated workplace they may need more assistance and engagement to help them make informed decisions as they are not necessarily relying on their peers in those situations,” she said.

Moulang caveated the research by saying that, although an association between the likelihood of individuals making investment strategy changes and their peers’ behaviour had been observed, that did not mean that peer effect was necessarily the cause.

Related Content

Gov to introduce a super consumer advocate

The Federal Government will establish a superannuation consumer advocate and has asked the Treasury to recommend a potential provider following a call...Read more

Super funds boost private capital industry

Australian private capital investment industry has been boosted by significant institutional support from within the nation’s $2.8 trillion superann...Read more

Memo ASIC: It ain’t illegal to underperform

Memo: Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) deputy chair and erstwhile deputy chair of the Productivity Commission (PC), Karen Chest...Read more



Add new comment