Make SMSFs pull their weight, says ASFA

13 August 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Large superannuation funds have baulked at having to pay for the cost of extending SuperStream to self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) and has told the Government that SMSFs should be made to pull their own weight via a levy.

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has raised a number of issues with respect to the move to extend SuperStream to SMSFs, not least its cost but also around issues of fraud.

It said that there was a real risk of potential fraud associated with extending rollover services to SMSFs and argued that the regulations would need to ensure that appropriate security measures were implemented, particularly relating to validating bank account details for the rollover monies from Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) funds to SMSFs.

“To protect the best interests of superannuation fund members, the question of liability also needs to be clarified in the event that incorrect or fraudulent bank account details are provided to the trustee from this mandatory service which the trustee relies on,” it said.

“Superannuation fund trustees and/or their members should not be liable for any loss in these circumstances and the verification of bank accounts should be mandatory before any SuperStream rollover to an SMSF can occur,” the ASFA submission to Treasury said.

“Similarly, validation for the SMSF itself requires the same robust layers of security, ensuring that Anti Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Terrorism Financing (CTF) checks are also made in line with other APRA-regulated fund payment processes,” it said.

On the question of SMSFs being made to pull their own weight, ASFA said that APRA-regulated funds had borne the brunt of the $1.5 billion Super Stream implementation costs and it seemed extending the rollover service to SMSFs would increase those costs further.

“Extending the operation of SuperStream to SMSF rollovers will increase costs further for APRA regulated funds and it would appear with little or no cost burden falling on the SMSF sector,” it said. “During this regulatory reform process that is targeted at SMSFs we recommend that the Government review the levies and charges that SMSFs pay and ensure that they commence sharing the cost of SuperStream services.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 1 day ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 1 week ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND